Anyone ? please

This is a great solution! I just ran and tested it and even tried your suggested patch.

@greglbd, thanks for testing that up, I appreciate 😉

@travi, I don't like having to ping someone, but since it's been 6 months already, could we have at least a word from you on this issue please ? Thanks 😊

any progress here? I have the same issue and would like to get rid of this patch

@gr2m Is there any chance to merge this?

Reporting live from August 28, 2024

I put this fix into my own @jcoreio/semantic-release-npm and have been using it successfully in several pnpm monorepos for quite awhile now.
@travi @gr2m @babblebey is there any opposition to this? I'd like to help get it merged

could someone help me the use case where this is necessary vs setting main/exports and files appropriately?

to move this forward, we would need the conflicts resolved and make sure that this scenario is covered by a test

@travi in my case I am passing the pkgRoot: 'dist' option to @semantic-release/npm (or rather, my fork that includes this fix) because I build everything into the dist folder (including a transformed package.json) and publish from there.

I need to confirm whether I had issues with pkgRoot in single package repos or just in monorepos, but regardless, as @greglbd pointed out, the prepare call is using cwd: basePath, whereas the publish call is using cwd. The difference seems like an accident, and I doubt there is any justification for it?

I am passing the pkgRoot: 'dist' option to @semantic-release/npm (or rather, my fork that includes this fix) because I build everything into the dist folder (including a transformed package.json) and publish from there

i understand that folks tend to do this, but i've never understood why. can you help me grasp the why of that decision?

i bundle into either a dist or lib in most of my packages as well, but just include that directory in the path of what is defined as main or exports. then, i basically just include that folder in the files property so that all other files are excluded when publishing to the registry.

i'm open to fixing pkgRoot either way, but i'm wondering if we should add documentation directing folks to the alternative that at least seems simpler to me that maybe some folks dont understand is an option

Yeah there are several reasons.

Back when I started doing it support for export maps wasn't very widespread, and I wanted import {foo} from 'my-pkg/foo' to work without export maps, which is only possible if foo.js lives in the package root. Otherwise the subpath imports would have to look like my-pkg/dist/foo. Now that export maps are widely supported, you would think this is no longer necessary; but, unfortunately the default TypeScript compiler options, which ignore export maps, are still widespread among library consumers afaik. So even if the export map works fine with bundlers/runtimes, I would still have to tell library consumers to change their TS config.

The alternative to this is to build src/foo.ts -> ./foo.js and publish from the root dir. This can also work, but you have to be careful what you name files and subdirectories inside src/, and it makes cleaning up the build output more fraught.

Aside from that, I figured I might as well strip dev-only fields from the package.json I publish, and I like the peace of mind that comes with publishing from isolated build output, not having to worry about .npmignore or "files": [...] etc.

those are helpful. thanks for taking the time to explain 👍🏼